Merge pull request #734 from nicoddemus/revamp-readme
This commit is contained in:
76
OVERVIEW.md
76
OVERVIEW.md
@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Overview #
|
||||
|
||||
`xdist` works by spawning one or more **workers**, which are controlled
|
||||
by the **controller**. Each **worker** is responsible for performing
|
||||
a full test collection and afterwards running tests as dictated by the **controller**.
|
||||
|
||||
The execution flow is:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **controller** spawns one or more **workers** at the beginning of
|
||||
the test session. The communication between **controller** and **worker** nodes makes use of
|
||||
[execnet](https://codespeak.net/execnet/) and its [gateways](https://codespeak.net/execnet/basics.html#gateways-bootstrapping-python-interpreters).
|
||||
The actual interpreters executing the code for the **workers** might
|
||||
be remote or local.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Each **worker** itself is a mini pytest runner. **workers** at this
|
||||
point perform a full test collection, sending back the collected
|
||||
test-ids back to the **controller** which does not
|
||||
perform any collection itself.
|
||||
|
||||
1. The **controller** receives the result of the collection from all nodes.
|
||||
At this point the **controller** performs some sanity check to ensure that
|
||||
all **workers** collected the same tests (including order), bailing out otherwise.
|
||||
If all is well, it converts the list of test-ids into a list of simple
|
||||
indexes, where each index corresponds to the position of that test in the
|
||||
original collection list. This works because all nodes have the same
|
||||
collection list, and saves bandwidth because the **controller** can now tell
|
||||
one of the workers to just *execute test index 3* index of passing the
|
||||
full test id.
|
||||
|
||||
1. If **dist-mode** is **each**: the **controller** just sends the full list
|
||||
of test indexes to each node at this moment.
|
||||
|
||||
1. If **dist-mode** is **load**: the **controller** takes around 25% of the
|
||||
tests and sends them one by one to each **worker** in a round robin
|
||||
fashion. The rest of the tests will be distributed later as **workers**
|
||||
finish tests (see below).
|
||||
|
||||
1. Note that `pytest_xdist_make_scheduler` hook can be used to implement custom tests distribution logic.
|
||||
|
||||
1. **workers** re-implement `pytest_runtestloop`: pytest's default implementation
|
||||
basically loops over all collected items in the `session` object and executes
|
||||
the `pytest_runtest_protocol` for each test item, but in xdist **workers** sit idly
|
||||
waiting for **controller** to send tests for execution. As tests are
|
||||
received by **workers**, `pytest_runtest_protocol` is executed for each test.
|
||||
Here it worth noting an implementation detail: **workers** always must keep at
|
||||
least one test item on their queue due to how the `pytest_runtest_protocol(item, nextitem)`
|
||||
hook is defined: in order to pass the `nextitem` to the hook, the worker must wait for more
|
||||
instructions from controller before executing that remaining test. If it receives more tests,
|
||||
then it can safely call `pytest_runtest_protocol` because it knows what the `nextitem` parameter will be.
|
||||
If it receives a "shutdown" signal, then it can execute the hook passing `nextitem` as `None`.
|
||||
|
||||
1. As tests are started and completed at the **workers**, the results are sent
|
||||
back to the **controller**, which then just forwards the results to
|
||||
the appropriate pytest hooks: `pytest_runtest_logstart` and
|
||||
`pytest_runtest_logreport`. This way other plugins (for example `junitxml`)
|
||||
can work normally. The **controller** (when in dist-mode **load**)
|
||||
decides to send more tests to a node when a test completes, using
|
||||
some heuristics such as test durations and how many tests each **worker**
|
||||
still has to run.
|
||||
|
||||
1. When the **controller** has no more pending tests it will
|
||||
send a "shutdown" signal to all **workers**, which will then run their
|
||||
remaining tests to completion and shut down. At this point the
|
||||
**controller** will sit waiting for **workers** to shut down, still
|
||||
processing events such as `pytest_runtest_logreport`.
|
||||
|
||||
## FAQ ##
|
||||
|
||||
> Why does each worker do its own collection, as opposed to having
|
||||
the controller collect once and distribute from that collection to the workers?
|
||||
|
||||
If collection was performed by controller then it would have to
|
||||
serialize collected items to send them through the wire, as workers live in another process.
|
||||
The problem is that test items are not easily (impossible?) to serialize, as they contain references to
|
||||
the test functions, fixture managers, config objects, etc. Even if one manages to serialize it,
|
||||
it seems it would be very hard to get it right and easy to break by any small change in pytest.
|
||||
314
README.rst
314
README.rst
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
============
|
||||
pytest-xdist
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
.. image:: http://img.shields.io/pypi/v/pytest-xdist.svg
|
||||
:alt: PyPI version
|
||||
@@ -17,36 +19,17 @@
|
||||
.. image:: https://img.shields.io/badge/code%20style-black-000000.svg
|
||||
:target: https://github.com/ambv/black
|
||||
|
||||
xdist: pytest distributed testing plugin
|
||||
========================================
|
||||
The `pytest-xdist`_ plugin extends pytest with new test execution modes, the most used being distributing
|
||||
tests across multiple CPUs to speed up test execution::
|
||||
|
||||
The `pytest-xdist`_ plugin extends pytest with some unique
|
||||
test execution modes:
|
||||
|
||||
* test run parallelization_: if you have multiple CPUs or hosts you can use
|
||||
those for a combined test run. This allows to speed up
|
||||
development or to use special resources of `remote machines`_.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* ``--looponfail``: run your tests repeatedly in a subprocess. After each run
|
||||
pytest waits until a file in your project changes and then re-runs
|
||||
the previously failing tests. This is repeated until all tests pass
|
||||
after which again a full run is performed.
|
||||
|
||||
* `Multi-Platform`_ coverage: you can specify different Python interpreters
|
||||
or different platforms and run tests in parallel on all of them.
|
||||
|
||||
Before running tests remotely, ``pytest`` efficiently "rsyncs" your
|
||||
program source code to the remote place. All test results
|
||||
are reported back and displayed to your local terminal.
|
||||
You may specify different Python versions and interpreters.
|
||||
|
||||
If you would like to know how pytest-xdist works under the covers, checkout
|
||||
`OVERVIEW <https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-xdist/blob/master/OVERVIEW.md>`_.
|
||||
pytest -n auto
|
||||
|
||||
With this call, pytest will spawn a number of workers processes equal to the number of available CPUs, and distribute
|
||||
the tests randomly across them. There is also a number of `distribution modes`_ to choose from.
|
||||
|
||||
**NOTE**: due to how pytest-xdist is implemented, the ``-s/--capture=no`` option does not work.
|
||||
|
||||
.. contents:: **Table of Contents**
|
||||
|
||||
Installation
|
||||
------------
|
||||
@@ -61,29 +44,47 @@ To use ``psutil`` for detection of the number of CPUs available, install the ``p
|
||||
pip install pytest-xdist[psutil]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Features
|
||||
--------
|
||||
|
||||
* Test run parallelization_: tests can be executed across multiple CPUs or hosts.
|
||||
This allows to speed up development or to use special resources of `remote machines`_.
|
||||
|
||||
* ``--looponfail``: run your tests repeatedly in a subprocess. After each run
|
||||
pytest waits until a file in your project changes and then re-runs
|
||||
the previously failing tests. This is repeated until all tests pass
|
||||
after which again a full run is performed.
|
||||
|
||||
* `Multi-Platform`_ coverage: you can specify different Python interpreters
|
||||
or different platforms and run tests in parallel on all of them.
|
||||
|
||||
Before running tests remotely, ``pytest`` efficiently "rsyncs" your
|
||||
program source code to the remote place.
|
||||
You may specify different Python versions and interpreters. It does not
|
||||
installs/synchronize dependencies however.
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: this mode exists mostly for backward compatibility, as modern development
|
||||
relies on continuous integration for multi-platform testing.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _parallelization:
|
||||
|
||||
Speed up test runs by sending tests to multiple CPUs
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Running tests across multiple CPUs
|
||||
----------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
To send tests to multiple CPUs, use the ``-n`` (or ``--numprocesses``) option::
|
||||
|
||||
pytest -n NUMCPUS
|
||||
pytest -n 8
|
||||
|
||||
Pass ``-n auto`` to use as many processes as your computer has CPU cores. This
|
||||
can lead to considerable speed ups, especially if your test suite takes a
|
||||
noticeable amount of time.
|
||||
|
||||
If a test crashes a worker, pytest-xdist will automatically restart that worker
|
||||
and report the test’s failure. You can use the ``--max-worker-restart`` option
|
||||
to limit the number of worker restarts that are allowed, or disable restarting
|
||||
altogether using ``--max-worker-restart 0``.
|
||||
The test distribution algorithm is configured with the ``--dist`` command-line option:
|
||||
|
||||
By default, using ``--numprocesses`` will send pending tests to any worker that
|
||||
is available, without any guaranteed order. You can change the test
|
||||
distribution algorithm this with the ``--dist`` option. It takes these values:
|
||||
.. _distribution modes:
|
||||
|
||||
* ``--dist no``: The default algorithm, distributing one test at a time.
|
||||
* ``--dist load`` **(default)**: Sends pending tests to any worker that is
|
||||
available, without any guaranteed order.
|
||||
|
||||
* ``--dist loadscope``: Tests are grouped by **module** for *test functions*
|
||||
and by **class** for *test methods*. Groups are distributed to available
|
||||
@@ -96,67 +97,31 @@ distribution algorithm this with the ``--dist`` option. It takes these values:
|
||||
distributed to available workers as whole units. This guarantees that all
|
||||
tests in a file run in the same worker.
|
||||
|
||||
* ``--dist loadgroup``: Tests are grouped by xdist_group mark. Groups are
|
||||
* ``--dist loadgroup``: Tests are grouped by the ``xdist_group`` mark. Groups are
|
||||
distributed to available workers as whole units. This guarantees that all
|
||||
tests with same xdist_group name run in the same worker.
|
||||
tests with same ``xdist_group`` name run in the same worker.
|
||||
|
||||
Making session-scoped fixtures execute only once
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
``pytest-xdist`` is designed so that each worker process will perform its own collection and execute
|
||||
a subset of all tests. This means that tests in different processes requesting a high-level
|
||||
scoped fixture (for example ``session``) will execute the fixture code more than once, which
|
||||
breaks expectations and might be undesired in certain situations.
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xdist_group(name="group1")
|
||||
def test1():
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
While ``pytest-xdist`` does not have a builtin support for ensuring a session-scoped fixture is
|
||||
executed exactly once, this can be achieved by using a lock file for inter-process communication.
|
||||
class TestA:
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xdist_group("group1")
|
||||
def test2():
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
The example below needs to execute the fixture ``session_data`` only once (because it is
|
||||
resource intensive, or needs to execute only once to define configuration options, etc), so it makes
|
||||
use of a `FileLock <https://pypi.org/project/filelock/>`_ to produce the fixture data only once
|
||||
when the first process requests the fixture, while the other processes will then read
|
||||
the data from a file.
|
||||
This will make sure ``test1`` and ``TestA::test2`` will run in the same worker.
|
||||
Tests without the ``xdist_group`` mark are distributed normally as in the ``--dist=load`` mode.
|
||||
|
||||
Here is the code:
|
||||
* ``--dist no``: The normal pytest execution mode, runs one test at a time (no distribution at all).
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
from filelock import FileLock
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
|
||||
def session_data(tmp_path_factory, worker_id):
|
||||
if worker_id == "master":
|
||||
# not executing in with multiple workers, just produce the data and let
|
||||
# pytest's fixture caching do its job
|
||||
return produce_expensive_data()
|
||||
|
||||
# get the temp directory shared by all workers
|
||||
root_tmp_dir = tmp_path_factory.getbasetemp().parent
|
||||
|
||||
fn = root_tmp_dir / "data.json"
|
||||
with FileLock(str(fn) + ".lock"):
|
||||
if fn.is_file():
|
||||
data = json.loads(fn.read_text())
|
||||
else:
|
||||
data = produce_expensive_data()
|
||||
fn.write_text(json.dumps(data))
|
||||
return data
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The example above can also be use in cases a fixture needs to execute exactly once per test session, like
|
||||
initializing a database service and populating initial tables.
|
||||
|
||||
This technique might not work for every case, but should be a starting point for many situations
|
||||
where executing a high-scope fixture exactly once is important.
|
||||
|
||||
Running tests in a Python subprocess
|
||||
------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
To instantiate a python3.9 subprocess and send tests to it, you may type::
|
||||
To instantiate a ``python3.9`` subprocess and send tests to it, you may type::
|
||||
|
||||
pytest -d --tx popen//python=python3.9
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -253,8 +218,21 @@ at once. The specifications strings use the `xspec syntax`_.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _`execnet`: https://codespeak.net/execnet
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
When tests crash
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
If a test crashes a worker, pytest-xdist will automatically restart that worker
|
||||
and report the test’s failure. You can use the ``--max-worker-restart`` option
|
||||
to limit the number of worker restarts that are allowed, or disable restarting
|
||||
altogether using ``--max-worker-restart 0``.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
How-tos
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
Identifying the worker process during a test
|
||||
--------------------------------------------
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
*New in version 1.15.*
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -315,7 +293,7 @@ Since version 2.0, the following functions are also available in the ``xdist`` m
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Identifying workers from the system environment
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
*New in version 2.4*
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -335,7 +313,7 @@ external scripts.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Uniquely identifying the current test run
|
||||
-----------------------------------------
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
*New in version 1.32.*
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -369,14 +347,14 @@ Additionally, during a test run, the following environment variable is defined:
|
||||
* ``PYTEST_XDIST_TESTRUNUID``: the unique id of the test run.
|
||||
|
||||
Accessing ``sys.argv`` from the controller node in workers
|
||||
----------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
To access the ``sys.argv`` passed to the command-line of the controller node, use
|
||||
``request.config.workerinput["mainargv"]``.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Specifying test exec environments in an ini file
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
You can use pytest's ini file configuration to avoid typing common options.
|
||||
You can for example make running with three subprocesses your default like this:
|
||||
@@ -401,7 +379,7 @@ to run tests in each of the environments.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Specifying "rsync" dirs in an ini-file
|
||||
--------------------------------------
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
In a ``tox.ini`` or ``setup.cfg`` file in your root project directory
|
||||
you may specify directories to include or to exclude in synchronisation:
|
||||
@@ -419,20 +397,148 @@ where the configuration file was found.
|
||||
.. _`pytest-xdist repository`: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-xdist
|
||||
.. _`pytest`: http://pytest.org
|
||||
|
||||
Groups tests by xdist_group mark
|
||||
---------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
*New in version 2.4.*
|
||||
Making session-scoped fixtures execute only once
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
Two or more tests belonging to different classes or modules can be executed in same worker through the xdist_group marker:
|
||||
``pytest-xdist`` is designed so that each worker process will perform its own collection and execute
|
||||
a subset of all tests. This means that tests in different processes requesting a high-level
|
||||
scoped fixture (for example ``session``) will execute the fixture code more than once, which
|
||||
breaks expectations and might be undesired in certain situations.
|
||||
|
||||
While ``pytest-xdist`` does not have a builtin support for ensuring a session-scoped fixture is
|
||||
executed exactly once, this can be achieved by using a lock file for inter-process communication.
|
||||
|
||||
The example below needs to execute the fixture ``session_data`` only once (because it is
|
||||
resource intensive, or needs to execute only once to define configuration options, etc), so it makes
|
||||
use of a `FileLock <https://pypi.org/project/filelock/>`_ to produce the fixture data only once
|
||||
when the first process requests the fixture, while the other processes will then read
|
||||
the data from a file.
|
||||
|
||||
Here is the code:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xdist_group(name="group1")
|
||||
def test1():
|
||||
pass
|
||||
import json
|
||||
|
||||
class TestA:
|
||||
@pytest.mark.xdist_group("group1")
|
||||
def test2():
|
||||
pass
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
from filelock import FileLock
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
|
||||
def session_data(tmp_path_factory, worker_id):
|
||||
if worker_id == "master":
|
||||
# not executing in with multiple workers, just produce the data and let
|
||||
# pytest's fixture caching do its job
|
||||
return produce_expensive_data()
|
||||
|
||||
# get the temp directory shared by all workers
|
||||
root_tmp_dir = tmp_path_factory.getbasetemp().parent
|
||||
|
||||
fn = root_tmp_dir / "data.json"
|
||||
with FileLock(str(fn) + ".lock"):
|
||||
if fn.is_file():
|
||||
data = json.loads(fn.read_text())
|
||||
else:
|
||||
data = produce_expensive_data()
|
||||
fn.write_text(json.dumps(data))
|
||||
return data
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The example above can also be use in cases a fixture needs to execute exactly once per test session, like
|
||||
initializing a database service and populating initial tables.
|
||||
|
||||
This technique might not work for every case, but should be a starting point for many situations
|
||||
where executing a high-scope fixture exactly once is important.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
How does xdist work?
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
``xdist`` works by spawning one or more **workers**, which are
|
||||
controlled by the **controller**. Each **worker** is responsible for
|
||||
performing a full test collection and afterwards running tests as
|
||||
dictated by the **controller**.
|
||||
|
||||
The execution flow is:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **controller** spawns one or more **workers** at the beginning of the
|
||||
test session. The communication between **controller** and **worker**
|
||||
nodes makes use of `execnet <https://codespeak.net/execnet/>`__ and
|
||||
its
|
||||
`gateways <https://codespeak.net/execnet/basics.html#gateways-bootstrapping-python-interpreters>`__.
|
||||
The actual interpreters executing the code for the **workers** might
|
||||
be remote or local.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Each **worker** itself is a mini pytest runner. **workers** at this
|
||||
point perform a full test collection, sending back the collected
|
||||
test-ids back to the **controller** which does not perform any
|
||||
collection itself.
|
||||
|
||||
3. The **controller** receives the result of the collection from all
|
||||
nodes. At this point the **controller** performs some sanity check to
|
||||
ensure that all **workers** collected the same tests (including
|
||||
order), bailing out otherwise. If all is well, it converts the list
|
||||
of test-ids into a list of simple indexes, where each index
|
||||
corresponds to the position of that test in the original collection
|
||||
list. This works because all nodes have the same collection list, and
|
||||
saves bandwidth because the **controller** can now tell one of the
|
||||
workers to just *execute test index 3* index of passing the full test
|
||||
id.
|
||||
|
||||
4. If **dist-mode** is **each**: the **controller** just sends the full
|
||||
list of test indexes to each node at this moment.
|
||||
|
||||
5. If **dist-mode** is **load**: the **controller** takes around 25% of
|
||||
the tests and sends them one by one to each **worker** in a round
|
||||
robin fashion. The rest of the tests will be distributed later as
|
||||
**workers** finish tests (see below).
|
||||
|
||||
6. Note that ``pytest_xdist_make_scheduler`` hook can be used to
|
||||
implement custom tests distribution logic.
|
||||
|
||||
7. **workers** re-implement ``pytest_runtestloop``: pytest’s default
|
||||
implementation basically loops over all collected items in the
|
||||
``session`` object and executes the ``pytest_runtest_protocol`` for
|
||||
each test item, but in xdist **workers** sit idly waiting for
|
||||
**controller** to send tests for execution. As tests are received by
|
||||
**workers**, ``pytest_runtest_protocol`` is executed for each test.
|
||||
Here it worth noting an implementation detail: **workers** always
|
||||
must keep at least one test item on their queue due to how the
|
||||
``pytest_runtest_protocol(item, nextitem)`` hook is defined: in order
|
||||
to pass the ``nextitem`` to the hook, the worker must wait for more
|
||||
instructions from controller before executing that remaining test. If
|
||||
it receives more tests, then it can safely call
|
||||
``pytest_runtest_protocol`` because it knows what the ``nextitem``
|
||||
parameter will be. If it receives a “shutdown” signal, then it can
|
||||
execute the hook passing ``nextitem`` as ``None``.
|
||||
|
||||
8. As tests are started and completed at the **workers**, the results
|
||||
are sent back to the **controller**, which then just forwards the
|
||||
results to the appropriate pytest hooks: ``pytest_runtest_logstart``
|
||||
and ``pytest_runtest_logreport``. This way other plugins (for example
|
||||
``junitxml``) can work normally. The **controller** (when in
|
||||
dist-mode **load**) decides to send more tests to a node when a test
|
||||
completes, using some heuristics such as test durations and how many
|
||||
tests each **worker** still has to run.
|
||||
|
||||
9. When the **controller** has no more pending tests it will send a
|
||||
“shutdown” signal to all **workers**, which will then run their
|
||||
remaining tests to completion and shut down. At this point the
|
||||
**controller** will sit waiting for **workers** to shut down, still
|
||||
processing events such as ``pytest_runtest_logreport``.
|
||||
|
||||
FAQ
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Question**: Why does each worker do its own collection, as opposed to having the
|
||||
controller collect once and distribute from that collection to the
|
||||
workers?
|
||||
|
||||
If collection was performed by controller then it would have to
|
||||
serialize collected items to send them through the wire, as workers live
|
||||
in another process. The problem is that test items are not easily
|
||||
(impossible?) to serialize, as they contain references to the test
|
||||
functions, fixture managers, config objects, etc. Even if one manages to
|
||||
serialize it, it seems it would be very hard to get it right and easy to
|
||||
break by any small change in pytest.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user